Compliance
Compliance monitoring for the frameworks your auditor checks.
Same continuous scan engine, different evidence pack. Map findings to SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, or FedRAMP control families.
By framework
Pick the framework you're being audited on.
SOC 2
SOC 2 monitoring
Trust-service-criteria evidence for CC6 (security) and CC7 (system operations). Continuous scans produce the artifacts your CPA expects.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 monitoring
Annex A control evidence, especially 8.x (technical) controls. Continuous monitoring for 8.16 incident detection, plus audit-ready exports.
HIPAA
HIPAA monitoring
Technical safeguards evidence for §164.312, especially transmission security, audit controls, and integrity controls. PHI-aware scan scoping.
PCI DSS
PCI DSS monitoring
Requirement 6 (secure development) and Requirement 11 (security testing) evidence. Continuous monitoring across the CDE surface.
GDPR
GDPR monitoring
Article 32 'state of the art' technical measures evidence. Continuous monitoring of integrity and confidentiality controls.
FedRAMP
FedRAMP monitoring
Continuous monitoring for cloud-service authorization. NIST SP 800-53 control evidence for SI, SC, and AU control families.
Hand your auditor real evidence.
Run a scan, save the report, hand the PDF to the auditor. No scrambling the week before.
FAQ
Picking a framework, answered.
Which framework should I start with if my customers are asking for compliance?
Start with SOC 2 if you sell SaaS to US enterprise buyers, since it's what their procurement teams ask for first. Choose ISO 27001 if your customers are in the EU or internationally distributed. Add PCI DSS only if you store, process, or transmit payment card data, and HIPAA only if you touch protected health information. GDPR applies automatically if you have EU users, and FedRAMP is only relevant if you're selling to US federal agencies.
Does Barrion replace Vanta, Drata, or Secureframe?
No. GRC platforms like Vanta, Drata, and Secureframe manage policies, HR onboarding, vendor risk, and the audit workflow itself. Barrion sits alongside them and produces the technical web-tier evidence (TLS, headers, DAST, exposed services) those platforms ask you to upload as control evidence.
Can one Barrion subscription produce evidence for multiple frameworks?
Yes. Every scan is mapped to all six supported frameworks in parallel, so the same continuous monitoring run produces SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, and FedRAMP evidence simultaneously. You just pick the export format that matches the audit you're preparing for.
How fresh does evidence need to be for a Type II report?
Auditors care about cadence-consistent evidence across the full observation window, not just a single recent scan. Daily scans on the Business plan are the safe default, since they give you a continuous timestamped history that proves the control was operating throughout the window.
What if our auditor uses a custom framework like CIS Controls or NIST CSF?
Custom mapping is available on the Business plan. We can tag findings to any framework we support, so if your auditor works from CIS Controls, NIST CSF, or an internal control catalog, you can produce evidence mapped to those control IDs without changing how you scan.