SaaS security
Continuous evidence for the customer security review.
SOC 2 monitoring + customer-facing security review packs. Built for SaaS teams that need a clean answer the next time an enterprise prospect ships their security questionnaire.
The SaaS reality
What the security questionnaire actually costs you.
Reviews
Customer security questionnaires
Every enterprise prospect ships a 200-row spreadsheet. Without monitoring evidence and a current PDF, the deal stalls in security review for weeks.
SOC 2
Continuous control evidence
Auditors want CC6 (security) and CC7 (system operations) artifacts that span the audit window. One-off scan reports don't satisfy a Type II report.
Scale
Multi-tenant surface
Marketing site, app subdomain, customer subdomains, API endpoints, status page, the surface grows faster than the security team can manually re-check it.
How Barrion fits
Continuous monitoring, review-pack ready.
Coverage
35+ checks across web and API surfaces
TLS, headers, CORS, cookies, DNS, email auth, network exposure, JS CVE detection, plus PR-aware SAST when you connect a GitHub org.
Evidence
SOC 2-mapped reports
Every scan exports as PDF and CSV with findings tagged to CC6.1, CC6.6, CC6.7, CC7.1, CC7.2. Drop straight into your auditor's request list.
Reviews
Customer security review packs
Hand prospects a timestamped score, finding lifecycle, and trend graph instead of a stale screenshot. Closes review faster than a one-shot pentest report.
Speed
First report in 60 seconds
No agent install, no source-code upload. Paste the URL, get a real report, attach it to the next security questionnaire response.
FAQ
SaaS security, answered.
Why is continuous monitoring better than an annual SaaS pentest for SOC 2?
An annual pentest is a snapshot. SOC 2 Type II covers a window of 3 to 12 months, and auditors want evidence that controls were operating across that window, not just on one day in March. Continuous monitoring produces dated scan results, finding lifecycle data, and remediation timestamps for the full audit period, which is what CC6 and CC7 actually ask for. A pentest is still useful once a year for deeper logic testing, but it cannot replace the evidence trail your auditor needs.
Can I share a Barrion report directly with an enterprise prospect?
Yes. Every scan exports as a timestamped PDF with your score, finding list, severity breakdown, and trend over time. Most teams attach it to the customer security review response alongside their SOC 2 letter and policies. It is meant to be customer-facing, not just an internal report, so the language and formatting are written for a security reviewer on the other side of the deal.
How does multi-tenant scanning work, do my customer subdomains get scanned?
You add the hosts you want covered (marketing site, app subdomain, API, status page, and any customer-facing subdomains you own). Barrion scans only what you explicitly add and verify. Customer-tenanted subdomains under your apex are in scope when you add them, customer-owned domains are not. The Business plan is sized for SaaS teams running several hosts on a single scan cadence.
How does this compare to Vanta or Drata?
Vanta and Drata are GRC platforms, they track policies, vendors, employee onboarding, and integrations with your cloud and HR stack. Barrion is the technical scanning layer, the part that actually checks your live application and exports findings against CC6.1, CC6.6, CC6.7, CC7.1, and CC7.2. The two are complementary. Teams typically pair them: GRC tool for the program, Barrion for the production security evidence the program needs.
Close the next security review faster.
Free first scan, no setup. Upgrade for continuous monitoring, real-time alerts, and audit-ready exports.